CNN – A revolutionary car that runs on air

MIKE HUCKABEE FOR VICE PRESIDENT!!! I like the idea of this car and I hope that it will be a success. My only regret is that it was not created and produce in America. I hope that they will make a model that is as safe as a full size suv. The more metal the more safer. Guy Negre of MDI Air Car engine that runs on compressed air. Emissions are only filtered air that’s cleaner than outside air. 300 bars of pressure in carbon-fibre & kevlar air tanks, so if you get in an accident they will not explode. Car can travel up to 68.35 mph and has a 93.21 mile driving range. Refilling can be done by plugging in at home or at a gas station. Hybrid models use small amounts of bio-fuels that can extend the range to over 869.89 miles. Pollution free vehicle that produces zero emissions. When the car stops at traffic lights, the engine stops so no energy is lost because there’s no idling. The cost is starts out only at 00 with is pretty cheap and will save a lot of money on fuel b/c the fuel is just air. SIGN THE TAX REFORM PLEGE AT WWW.FAIRTAX.ORG

This entry was posted in Air Deals Video and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

25 Responses to CNN – A revolutionary car that runs on air

  1. mspurplek420 says:

    i think it sounds like a great idea time we start saving the planet…

  2. spopajr says:

    They said the same thing about gas cars . IT was a flaming chariot. Never forget the PINTO>

  3. joaquinveyron says:

    “Pollution free vehicle that produces zero emissions.” ???? How can you say such stupid things, millionaireking?? Bingo!! Yet another stupid Billy Bob!

    “… can extend the range to over 869.89 miles”??? Really??? And why not 868.48??

  4. joaquinveyron says:

    How does this work with the roll of Pennies, Robby?

    I have to admit, my comment wasn’t complete. On the one hand you have dumb Frenchies like this MDI guy who really should spare the world with his rubbish car that cause much more CO2 than conventional cars, on the other hand you have dumb American Billy Bobs like you who believe any pseudo-scientific gibberish, without thinking for a second with the small portion of brain they have.

  5. RobertFeltenberger says:

    go shove a roll of pennies in your ass shang

  6. fizzguts says:

    Gotcha! bwahahaha

  7. salemcripple says:

    No, i just realize your a fucking troll. And i’m not going to be sucked into your shit.

  8. fizzguts says:

    So you admit you are stupid and lazy (and can’t spell) well good for you.

    Funny old world

  9. fizzguts says:

    By the way if you are so lazy and or stupid you can’t follow the link I posted that proves the horrible inefficency regarding this piece of crap why are you commenting??

  10. fizzguts says:

    Sigh Air compressors and air motors (you need both) are horrendously inefficient due to the ideal gas law. There is no way round this. An electric vehicle is five times more efficient

    Remember all the claims etc by MDI are lies This is an ongoing SCAM

  11. salemcripple says:

    Pretty self explanatory there genus.

  12. salemcripple says:

    Wasting it how? The modern internal combustion engine is every bit as inefficient as this thing is. By using this, you’d be doing the EXACT same thing as you would with a normal car, only without the Co2. I love the internal combustion engine more than most, but sadly something needs to be done.

  13. fizzguts says:

    “If you get your power from a clean power source”
    You’d be wasting it running this horribly inefficient piece of crap

  14. shanghaikidx says:

    Oh, please, France, stay with what you are good at: Perfume, cosmetics, gays, wine … but please do us the favor of sparing us the displeasure of French engineering. This MDI guy is dumb as hell.

  15. salemcripple says:

    If you get your power from a clean power source, then it becomes a completely green car. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that one out smart one.

  16. salemcripple says:

    lol. I wonder how many times i’d get pulled over for that?

  17. salemcripple says:

    Exactly! why can’t other people see it that way? I like this car, i think technologically it’s one of the coolest cars to ever be produced. But the only reservations i would have about buying one is the fact that it is uglier than sin. But i would still buy on given i had the money.

  18. GaryVonGary says:

    I don’t see what the big deal about image is. Just paint some naked ladies on the hood and you’re good to go!

  19. ElLanzXP says:

    thats not what i meant…. its important on BOTH aspects. The most important of course, is being that it works and that it can run on air. thats AWESOME. but, to help it sell, it wouldn’t hurt to think about the looks

  20. fizzguts says:

    It’s a con to suck money from technical illiterates for “Franchise” fees. It is short range, slow and horribly inefficient.
    Google “vencat 20 miles” for the latest on this scam.

  21. tigerbody1 says:

    Okay – let’s just think about looks and nothing else.

  22. tigerbody1 says:

    Yes, we should use the ideal way.

  23. tigerbody1 says:

    they should just be free!

    ;(

  24. tigerbody1 says:

    That is so funny!

  25. ElLanzXP says:

    a car that runs on air sounds awesome to some of us, but not everyone may think that. sometimes people just think about the looks… try looking at a millionare, he’s not gonna go around driving something unatractive, he wants to take care of his image… i agree with salemcripple, caring for the enviroment with this new invention is going to help us greatly, but it would be better if MORE people buy it, hence they need to work on the design, and the looks.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>